WASHINGTON
— Far-right media figures, relatively small in number but potent in
their influence, have embarked on a furious Internet expedition to cover
Representative Paul D. Ryan in political silt.
In 2012 when Mitt Romney
picked Mr. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, as his running mate, the
concern among some in their party was that Mr. Ryan was too
conservative, particularly when it came to overhauling social programs
like Medicare and Medicaid.
Now,
as he agonizes over whether to answer the appeal of his colleagues to
become their next speaker, the far right is trotting out a fresh
concern: Mr. Ryan is too far left.
He is being criticized on issues ranging from a 2008 vote to bail out large banks to his longstanding interest in immigration reform to his work on a bipartisan budget measure.
On Sunday night, the Drudge Report — a prime driver of conservative
commentary — dedicated separate headlines to bashing Mr. Ryan on policy
positionsEven a self-congratulatory book outlining how Mr. Ryan and two other Republican House leaders drafted Tea Party candidates to help them take over the House in 2010 — “Young Guns” — is being recast by some as a manual of how to be traitorous to conservatism.
“Tryouts for speaker continue,” Phyllis Schlafly, founder and chairwoman of the conservative Eagle Forum, said in a statement Friday, when Mr. Ryan was escaping Capitol Hill for the week. “The kingmakers are so desperate for someone to carry their liberal priorities that they are trying to force Congressman Paul Ryan into a job he does not want.”
The
influence of conservative websites has enraged members who were once
considered right of center themselves, and who are desperately trying to
keep Mr. Ryan from getting spooked.
“Anyone
who attacks Paul Ryan as being insufficiently conservative is either
woefully misinformed or maliciously destructive,” said Representative
Tom Cole, Republican of Oklahoma. “Paul Ryan has played a major role in
advancing the conservative cause and creating the Republican House
majority. His critics are not true conservatives. They are radical
populists who neither understand nor accept the institutions, procedures
and traditions that are the basis of constitutional governance.”
To some degree, the attacks on Mr. Ryan, so far an unwilling draft pick by his colleagues to replace Speaker John A. Boehner, reflect criticism of flashes of pragmatism by Mr. Ryan, the architect of his party’s conservative budget dogma.
Since
the 2012 general election defeat, Mr. Ryan has indeed become more of a
consensus builder and leader in the House, even as he has maintained his
ideological tilt. He has largely voted for bills to keep the government
operating and the debts paid when many other Republicans vote against
them these days.
He
was half the brain on a 2013 compromise with Senator Patty Murray,
Democrat of Washington, to funnel more money to the government and avert
two years of budget brinkmanship, even though two years earlier, he had
refused to sit on the original committee that tried and failed to find a
solution to the government’s financial problems.
Mr.
Ryan moved this year to the chairmanship of the tax-writing Ways and
Means Committee from the Budget Committee because he said he wanted even
greater influence on national fiscal policy, and his prescriptions are
anathema to most Democrats.
But
the current flak following Mr. Ryan stems from a growing and powerful
collection of far-right pundits and news media — from Mark Levin to
Laura Ingraham to the sites RedState and Breitbart and the new
Conservative Review — that have successfully wielded influence over
Republican voters and lawmakers in strongly conservative districts.
Their bill of particulars against Mr. Ryan have shifted from the national debt
and spending to immigration. Lately, they have focused on Mr. Ryan’s
enthusiastic support for free trade, traditionally a policy that has
gotten broad Republican support but is now being used as a bat against
him. Beyond Mr. Ryan, the conservative targets have seemingly shifted
from old time establishment lawmakers to a process seemingly more akin
to random selection.
No comments:
Post a Comment